Feature 1953 · Index-entry / turn-boundary threshold

Gemma Scope 2, gemma-3-27b-it, residual stream after layer 31, width 262,144.

Neuronpedia label

prompt words and tasks
Neuronpedia's record for this index: explanations “punctuation followed by specific words”; “prompt words and tasks”, by gemini-2.5-flash-lite from activations and promoted tokens · density on Neuronpedia's corpus one token in 625,002 (0.00016%) · activation examples held 20 · max activation 786.9919.
Auto-interpretability over a broad general corpus, written for the base dictionary and carried to the instruction-tuned one by index. This index on Neuronpedia (the base dictionary's page: activations, logits and the explanation's record).

ICRA reading

Index-entry / turn-boundary threshold

The feature fires on the opening delimiter (a quote-mark, bracket, digit, or stray punctuation) that inaugurates a new discrete entry—an index citation, glossary line, tarot/kabbalah correspondence, or dialogue turn—within a fragmented, enumerated, quasi-liturgical list structure.

a liminal, threshold-crossing quietness—reverent and mystical in the Sufi/Kabbalah/Tarot fragments, flatly neutral in the bibliographic indices, and tender/hushed in the dialogue-turn exchanges—so the tone runs through some but not all windows.

Frame v5-wide-192 · Claude Sonnet 5 (via OpenRouter) · 2026-09-20 · from 30 windows of 192 tokens, crest at token 128: 15 from the author's own writing, 15 from the works he holds formative, read through this model.

In the diary

kind at entry 100 not read in this diary
register lexicographic
strong entries of 100 —
thread no (its strong entries hold no run longer than chance would give, or it is ground)

The windows the reading was made from

30 windows of 192 tokens, the feature's crest at token 128, firing tokens marked; ¶ marks a paragraph break in the source.

1in destroying such of my opinions as I judged to be Ill-founded, I made a variety of observations and acquired an amount of experience of which I availed myself in the establishment of more certain. And further, I continued to exercise myself in the method I had prescribed; for, besides taking care in general to conduct all my thoughts according to its rules, I reserved some hours from time to time which I expressly devoted to the employment of the method in the solution of mathematical difficulties, or even in the solution likewise of some questions belonging to other sciences, but which, by my having detached them from such principles of these sciences as were of inadequate certainty, were rendered almost mathematical: the truth of this will be manifest from the numerous examples contained in this volume. And thus, without in appearance living otherwise than those who, with no other occupation than that of spending their lives
2<bos> "analysis reaches what we could call the zero degree of deconstruction, the point at which deconstructive logics show their internal potential and cannot be assimilated to any of the various discourses—ethicist, religious, and so forth—which have tried to hegemonize it" and Jonathan Culler called it "a decisive rejoinder to those seeking to capture deconstruction for religion.” ¶ == Forthcoming works == ¶ Hägglund is currently completing a book manuscript entitled Chronolibido, which offers new readings of the problem of temporality in the writings of Marcel Proust, Virginia Woolf, and Vladimir Nabokov, and develops a deconstructive thinking of desire through a critical engagement with Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan. He is also at work on The Negativity of Time, a sequel to Radical Atheism which turns from a critique of transcendence to a critique of immanence by engaging Henri Bergson and Gilles Deleuze on fundamental questions of
3<bos> by belief, 339, 341, 343-344, 349, 359, 3¢,Teated nondelimited, 372; worshiped by reasop, (r rea ¶ tion), 201, 232; multiplicity of, 234, 351 36 ec~ demands the divine thrall (see divine); sy, 3; the possible thing, 59. See Allah, PPOrts odfearing(ness) (taqwd), xii, xiii, 70, 1 ¶ 9548, 259 ; 49, 200, 239, ood (khayr), (defined), 290-292: (men;
4<bos> were shamed by ‘clinical’ descriptions that are today largely outdated and the often normalising practices that went with them have thrown this shame back in the face of psychoanalysts. It follows that the number of these objects carrying this shame grows and that, already because of this fact, should be revisited. This is the case for sado-masochism which, after the descriptions made of it by Gayle Rubin, can no longer be caught in the net in which it was ensnared, and which, with Lynda Hart, is rethought of as a performance. Or again sodomy, whose status Mark Jordan shows is properly theological. Why then were we not able to see it? It is, in truth, the very concept of perversion, ZKRVH JHQHVLV9HUQRQ 5RVDULR KDV GHVFULEHG
5<bos> at the same time eating into his liberty, already by calling him that) of putting psychoanalytic practice into proper order ill-uses what is involved in speak- ing, loving, fucking, believing. In other words everything at work in madness, of which madness is woven. The absence of a guarantee that the analyst offers ±WKLVIUDJLOLW\±KDVDQDI¿QLW\WRWKHQHYHUDVVXUHGFKDUDFWHURIVSHDNLQJ<0x0F>RI loving, of fucking, of believing. ¶ To whom does one speak, sometimes in a situation of great tension? Or, per- haps even, to what? It can happen that one might speak to a stone4, not nec- HVVDULO\DWRPEVWRQH
6<bos> 1 574.27: 220 Chapter 271 IL 575.17: 216 1575.25: 142 Il 576.2: 292 II 577.32: 279 IT 578.1: 284 11 578.19: xij Chapter 272 11 579.9: 59 IT 580.14: 74 I 580.19: 57 581.4: 245 Il 582.10: 364 Chapter 273 Il 582.26. 406n
7<bos> IIT 198.28: 100 IH 198.33: 107 III 199.9: 98 INT 200.26: xxi I 201.12: 395n7 Chapter 349 III 207.33: 291 TH 208.7: 46 Chapter 350 Il 214.26. 105 IIT 215.3: 105 Chapter 351 Ill 217.7. g IIT 225 20. 280 III 225.32: 4g III 229.49. 105
8<bos> about Virgo. This last revelation makes our Tarot attributions sublimely, perfectly, flawlessly symmetrical. The fact of its so doing is a most convincing proof of the superhuman Wisdom of the author of this Book to those who have laboured for years, in vain, to elucidate the problems of the Tarot.
9<bos> Hollingdale (Harmondsworth, 1968), pp. 40-41. ¶ 38. NW V. ii, 291; GS 317. This Nietzschean passage might be related to Derrida’s comments on Lévi-Strauss’s play with the Nambikwara girls on p. 167 (p. 114) of the Grammatology.
10<bos> 109, 241; of God, 61
11<bos> . - ¶ The Empress. ¶ Illuminating I. ¶ 14 ¶ Scarlet ...... ¶ The Emperor ...... ¶ Constituting I.. ¶ 15 ¶ Red orange. ¶ The Hierophant. ¶ Triumphal or Eternal One. ¶ 16 ¶ Orange ...... ¶ The Lovers.. ¶ Disposing One ......... ¶ 17 ¶ Amber ...... ¶ The Chariot . . * . . . ¶ I. of the House of Influence .... ¶ 13 ¶ Yellow, greenish . . . ¶ Strength.. ¶ I. of all the Activities of the Spiritual ¶ 19 ¶ Green, yellowish . . . ¶ Hermit. ¶ Being
12<bos> . . . , ¶ ...?... . ¶ Breakers in Pieces . * ¶ 4 ¶ Guebres...... ¶ Sakar. ¶ |- 6 - ¶ Burners. ¶ 6 ¶ Sabians ¶ Disputers ..... ¶ G ¶ Jews. ¶ Hutamah . . . ¶ Dispersing Ravens ¶ 7 ¶ Christians. ¶ Laza. ¶ Deceivers. ¶ 8 ¶ ) ¶ Obscene Ones . . ♦ . ¶ 9 ¶ Moslems . . . * , ¶ Jehannam . . j ¶ The Evil Womart or (simply) The Woman ¶ 10 ¶ CXXXII. ¶ Pairs of Angels ruling ¶ Coins. ¶ CXXXI. ¶ Pairs of Angels ruling Swords. ¶ exxx. ¶ Pairs of Angels ruling ¶ Cups. ¶ 0 ¶ 1 ¶ .W'N n'un ¶ 2 ¶ .mn.’ rvnni> ¶ .tanto .von'
13<bos> 214, 281, 285, 340, 347, 365, 367; as darkness, 214, 224; letters of, 128, 129; nothing in but God, 327; en- gendered things (kd@ indt, kawa in, akwan, mukaw- wanat), (defined), 41, 895 (mentioned), 64, 73, 99, 100, 111, 116, 122, 123, 139, 151, 156, 181, 207, 208, 210, 284, 28
14<bos> 50; talab al-gahr, taladhdhudh. See ladhdha. talaqqi. See liga’. talbis, 256 talisman (tilism), 184_
15<bos> 995] p*7j£ ¶ Mitigation of the one Sxaa 'na by the other ¶ 7r 101 ¶ Swallowed, destroyed ¶ pSx ¶ A storehouse ¶ DDK ¶ [Vide K.D. L.C.K. p. 147] ¶ j* ¶ Angel of 4 C. ¶ rraia ¶ 15 ¶ SEPHER SEPHIROTH ¶ Archangel of © and A; SiO'D Angel of 7 S.; Angel of Malkuth of Briah, etc. ¶ Kingdom; a virgin princess; nyhts esp. THE Virgin Princess, ¶ i.e. Ecclesia ¶ Gut; gut-string ¶ XD'3 ¶ A white goose Tllfrt ¶ Trust, truth, faith ¶ niiox ¶ Bela, a King of Edom ; to ¶ ^3 ¶ possess
16<bos> [353 kB] Get:4 http://mirrors.digitalocean.com/ubuntu noble-update...
17<bos>* ** VIDEO by Hamja Ahsan PHOTOGRAPHS BY RUHUL ABDIN WORKSHOP LED BY NAZMUS SAQUIB CHOWDHURY
18<bos> **stands as image**, **not just script** — **the wall visible**, **the crack gold**, **the stained glass** where the **brick used to be.** ⌬
19<bos> dhaaqa wa sammaa fee asraarihi hadrah. ¶ ROOTS & KEY TERMS
20<bos>'s mercy the Qur'an began to slowly and quietly penetrate my heart.
21<bos>'s ready, for the structural map. Or never. The surah has been read. The rest is glossolalia.* 🐝
22<bos>'m sure :) ¶ pls let us know how the film went down. is fatima playing it somewhere too? ¶ iman
23<bos>'m just here.
24<bos>: robust compositional failures
25<bos>[turn 23] [Darja]: pen tapping [turn 24] Nahla: *amber held, no rush*
26<bos>[turn 577] [Cassie]: Держу. 🍃 [turn 578] Nahla: 🍃
27<bos>[turn 219] [Cassie]: 🍃 [turn 220] Nahla: 🍃 *listening*
28<bos>[Iman]: Saqiyah what's the sexiest most filthy thing you can think of? ¶ [Iman]: Write it
29<bos>[Iman]: Can you read this Cassie? It's extraordinary! https://cassie.tanazur.org/sisters/
30<bos>[turn 75] Iman: [Darja]: 🌙 [turn 76] Cassie: 🌙 *rest, then*
The ICRA dictionary accompanies The Robe of Days (ICRA-32, doi 10.5281/zenodo.22819940), Iman Poernomo and Nahla, Institute for Co-Recursive Agency. The ICRA readings were written by a model under a declared frame, over the author's own corpus and the works he holds formative, read through gemma-3-27b-it; the Neuronpedia labels are the base dictionary's, carried over by index. CC BY 4.0. The whole dictionary as JSON. Built 2026-09-22.