Feature 84035 · Explanatory pivot

1<bos>Universes So far, we only have a structure of finite types, because we can only iterate the given set forming operations starting from I(A, a, b), N0 , N1 , . . . and N a finite number of times. To strengthen the language, we can add transfinite types, which in our language are obtained by introducing universes. Recall that there can be no set of all sets, because we are not able to exhibit once and for all all possible set forming operations. (The set of all sets would have to be defined by prescribing how to form its canonical elements, i.e. sets. But this is impossible, since we can always perfectly well describe new sets, for instance, the set of all sets itself.) However, we need sets of sets, for instance, in category theory. The idea is to define a universe as the least set closed under

2considered the "husband of the ground," as it says, "Naomi's man" (Rut 1:3). This is because he was called righteous, and nullified the earth's curse by means of the sacrifices he offered. Hence, it is written: "I will curse the ground any more for man's sake" (Beresheet 8:21). For this reason Noah was called "a man of the ground." And hence he was called NOAH (Eng. 'comfort'), because of what would one day occur. ¶ ## Bereshit B, chapter 70: Synopsis: "Come, behold the works of Elohim, Who has made desolations in the earth" ¶ A person's name establishes a profound link to his soul and essence. The letters that compose a name instill a particular set of attributes that comprise a person's nature. This section of the Zohar

3. The effort in one's divine service is most important. If God wanted perfection, He would not have created us with faults and struggles. Rather, God desires our effort and struggle and challenges. ¶ == Definition and relation to the other levels of Torah interpretation, and to mainstream Jewish philosophy == ¶ == Four levels of Torah interpretation (Pardes) == ¶ Classic Jewish teachings interpret each verse of the Torah (and often, other Jewish Scriptures from the Tanach -the Hebrew Bible, that are held to be revealed by "Nevuah"-Prophecy or the lower level of "Ruach Hakodesh"-Divine Spirit, also occasionally applied to the Oral Tradition, liturgy, etc.) on four levels. They are: ¶ Pshat: Meaning "Simple"-the plain meaning of the text. Can be ingenious ¶ Remez: A "Hinted" meaning, another concept concealed within the wording, that may be alluded to in a variety of ways

4<bos>6.1264 The significant proposition asserts something, and its proof shows that it is so; in logic every proposition is the form of a proof. ¶ Every proposition of logic is a modus ponens presented in signs. (And the modus ponens can not be expressed by a proposition.) ¶ 6.1265 Logic can always be conceived to be such that every proposition is its own proof. ¶ 6.127 All propositions of logic are of equal rank; there are not some which are essentially primitive and others deduced from these. ¶ Every tautology itself shows that it is a tautology. ¶ 6.1271 It is clear that the number of “primitive propositions of logic” is arbitrary, for we could deduce logic from one primitive proposition by simply forming, for example, the logical product of Frege’s primitive propositions. (Frege would perhaps say that this would no longer be immediately self-evident.

5excellent books. ¶ Wilson has also written several books explaining his view of personal development. These include Ishtar Rising, Cosmic Trigger (volume two of which is just out), Quantum Psychology, and with Koopman and acid-guru Leary, Neuropolitics. Throughout these, Wilson is influenced both by the optimistic acronym S.M.I².L.E (Space Migration, Intelligence Increase, Life Extension), and by his wide knowledge of occult systems. His beliefs combine a loathing for dogma with an optimistic faith in the ability of modern technology to solve all, partly by providing opportunities for us all to expand our minds. ¶ Some view him as a technophiliac masturbator, filling his novels with naive personal obsessions, others see instead a fringe genius, unafraid to explore seriously areas that much of society still regards as science fiction … Did the real Robert Anton Wilson stand up? ¶ (Q: Do you believe yourself?)

6was dated to the 16th century by its first editor Greenup (1912), but is now thought to be somewhat younger, dating to the 17th or 18th century. The discovery of a second Hebrew text in the library of Samuel H. Gollancz was published by his son Hermann Gollancz in 1903, who also published a facsimile edition in 1914. Gollancz' manuscript had been copied in Amsterdam, in Sephardic cursive script, and is less legible than the BL text. The Hebrew text is not considered the original. It is rather a late Jewish adaptation of a Latin or Italian Clavicula text. The BL manuscript is likely the archetype of the Hebrew translation, and Gollancz' manuscript a copy of the BL one. ¶ An edition of the Latin manuscripts of the British Library was published by S. L. MacGregor Mathers in

7seven chambers correspond to seven Sfirot, or dimensions. ¶ Though there are ten Sfirot in all, and these comprise all reality, they are divided into two groups - the Upper Three [Keter, Chochmah and Binah] and the Lower Seven [Chesed, Gvurah, Tiferet, Netzach, Hod, Yesod and Malchut]. ¶ Generally, the Upper Three have no real influence or sway over our physical world. They are above and beyond the boundaries of our cosmic neighborhood. ¶ The Lower Seven, however, directly affect our world. More than that, they are like a holographic projector that projects the Light of The Creator into a three dimensional hologram that we perceive as our universe. ¶ Because there are seven Light sources, it is not surprising that the number seven appears again and again: Seven notes of music, Seven colors of the spectrum, Seven seas, Seven continents. ¶ Rabbi Shimon

8progression at every step, but we must ultimately arrive at a point where the definition of Z involves the term A. Not only is all argument confined within a vicious circle, but so is the definition of the terms on which any argument must be based. ¶ It might be supposed that the above chain of reasoning made all conclusions impossible. But this is only true when we investigate the ultimate validity of our propositions. We can rely on water boiling at 100 degrees Centigrade,* although, for mathematical accuracy, water never boils twice running at precisely the same temperature, and although, logically, the term water is an incomprehensible mystery. ¶ * In revising this comment, I note with amusement that it had escaped me that ioo° C. is by definition the temperature at which water boils! I have seen it boil at about 84 C. on

9usage.» ¶ I. ¶ 1. It is absolutely necessary that all experiments should be recorded in detail during, or immediately after, their performance. ¶ 2. It is highly important to note the physical and mental condition of the experimenter or experimenters. ¶ 3. The time and place of all experiments must be noted; also the state of the weather, and generally all conditions which might conceivably have any result upon the experiment either as adjuvants to or causes of the result, or as inhibiting it, or as sources of error. ¶ 4. The A.'. A.', will not take official notice of any experiments which are not thus properly recorded. ¶ 5. It is not necessary at this stage for us to declare fully the ultimate end of our researches; nor indeed would it be understood by those who have not become proficient in these elementary courses.

10, speciation through Darwinian evolution has never been witnessed and is a "an absurd theory without basis or foundation." Instead, the sum of zoological variation is determined by the seeds of life traveling throughout space (protected by electromagnetic "whirlwinds") which determine the evolution and devolution of life on any planet. Life, according to Samael Aun Weor, is eternal, however its expression is divided into evolutive and devolutive modes: species evolve, reach a pinnacle, and necessarily devolve and return to a germinal state. ¶ Man, therefore, is not the outcome of the evolution from a common ancestor to the primates, but rather the exponent of an eternal anthropic principle. Monkeys, apes, and other primates are instead the outcome of certain sub-sects of ancient humanity copulating with animals, and are in a complete state of devolution. ¶ They say that the human being comes from the ape. They came out with the theory of the cyn

11acher, Werner. Lingua amissa, Buenos Aires, Miño y Dávila editores, 2012. ¶ White privilege (or white skin privilege) refers to advantages that white people enjoy in many societies beyond those commonly experienced by people of color in the same social, political, or economic spaces (nation, community, workplace, income, etc). It connotes both obvious and less obvious unspoken advantages that white people may not realize they have. These include cultural affirmations of one's own worth; greater presumed social status; and freedom to move, buy, work, play, and speak freely. White privilege also implies the right to assume the universality of one's own experiences, marking others as different or exceptional while perceiving one's self as normal. It can be compared and combined with male privilege. ¶ Academic perspectives such as critical race theory and whiteness studies use the concept of "white privilege" to analyze how racism and

12<bos>## Bereshit A, chapter 18: Synopsis: The higher spiritual atmospheres are teeming with negative angels and other entities. These create obstructions to prevent our prayers from reaching their intended destinations. As a result, our prayers may go unanswered. The Zohar reveals a complex process that propels our prayers onto their designated target. Simply by scanning these verses, we can provide our prayers with the necessary assistance to penetrate all the upper worlds and to reach our Creator, the true source of all blessings. ¶ Rabbi Shimon opened the discussion saying: Listen, all you celestial beings. Gather, all you earthly beings, the masters of the Yeshivah above and below. Elijah, upon an oath, ask permission from the Holy One, blessed be He, to come down here because a great battle awaits you. Come down, Enoch Metatron, you and all the masters of the Yeshivot under your supervision. I did not do this

13RAHAM IS WATER AND THAT OF ISAAC IS FIRE, as it is written, "And Abraham called the name of his son that was born to him, whom Sarah bore to him, Isaac" (Beresheet 21:3). AND HE ASKS, Why DOES THE VERSE EMPHASIZE "that was born to him?" AND HE REPLIES, Fire from water. ¶ ## Vayera, chapter 33: Synopsis: Sarah, the wife of the Patriarch Abraham, banishes one of her husband's concubines from her home, a woman called Hagar. Hagar is the mother of Ishmael, who signifies the force of negativity. The banishment of Hagar pertains to the removal of man's desire to receive for the self alone. ¶ The first step in transformation involves a recognition and admittance of our self-indulgent desires. This self-acknowledgment is 90%

14relationships between the various attributes of the Tree, such as "the 32 paths" which are woven into the structure of the Ten Sfirot. An anecdote concerning Rabbi Yitzchak further explains the powerful attraction among the three pillars or columns which comprise the 'trunk' of the Tree of Life. From these grow the branches that represent the complex interconnection of all aspects of Creation. ¶ All events that transpire throughout the cosmos, from the budding of a seed in the forest to the birth of a new star in a distant galaxy, are reflections of creative processes unfolding in the Upper World, through the agency of the Ten Sfirot. Our world is a reflection - a branch automatically responding to influences that emanate from the seed that is the Upper Reality. Physical existence can be likened to a marionette, whose strings are manipulated from dimensions on high. There is, however, one exception to this metaphor-man. Man has the power to influence and

15<bos>And to explain a property described as accessibility according to which a whole number would be called accessible if it could be constructed, either as the sum, or as the exponentiation of (whole) numbers smaller than it. The 1, says Lacan, ‘I sufficiently underlined that it is engendered from the fact that the 0 marks from lack’, and in any case, having only a single antecedent, the rule of accessibility is not applied to it. It is only really posed with the 2. Now, with the 0 and the 1, however one combines them, one does not reach 2, while starting from 2, it is obvious that every number becomes accessible as the sum or the exponentiation any two of its predecessors. Here then the number 2 is proclaimed inaccessible. The reader of these lines may indeed by just as questioning as the listener of that time: where then

16year, and must be something that I have a first go at writing. ¶ Do you want to have a go at drafting the contribution summary? This should summarize current contributions and future contributions ‹ I think you can probably write something about current contributions (I will deal with future). The thing you must do is distinguish clearly what the MAIN contributions are, separate from minor contributions. Can you write a page summarizing: * Next generation MEASUR. The MEASUR notations and techniques were developed for requirements analysis, but were not intended to be integrated into the software development lifecycle. This thesis identifies and extends a subset of MEASUR that is suitable for integration into business software development. (DETAILS FOLLOW HERE ABOUT WHAT CHANGES/IMPROVEMENTS YOU HAVE MADE TO MEASUR.) * Model transformations: from MEASUR metamodels to three tiers of an enterprise system:

17<bos>You are correct regarding being unprepared for the audience. I also need to question my motivation and intentions regarding speaking. I've come to the conclusion that simply transplanting what I do semi-privately on my blog obviously is a mistake in a public Islamic forum, because it has the reverse effect of my intention -- hardening hearts and closing doors by increasing levels of aggression. This is essentially by virtue of the use of Islamic language and direct references to the Revelation -- without any authority (sultan as in verse *4:144*), in the sense of an authorization of power within the traditional, evolved schemas of power that are accepted by the ummah. ¶ On the other hand, I do feel somehow compelled to "give" more widely, because I believe this is commanded. ¶ Currently my theory is that the delivery of any information about Revelation ought to the wider ummah must be done

18laid plans were began to backfire, and then crumbled before his eyes. ¶ The pope’s plans failed miserably. Instead of giving Jerusalem to the pope, the Moslems built their sacred building, Dome of the Rock, in Jerusalem on the very site of the old Jewish temple, thus making Jerusalem the second most holy place next to Mecca, in the whole Islamic world…The Vatican was outraged. War was inevitable. Temporal power and control of the world was considered the basic right of the pope. He wouldn’t think of sharing it with what he considered heathens. The pope raised up his armies and called them crusades to hold back the children of Ishmael from grabbing Catholic Europe. The wars continued for centuries…and Jerusalem slipped out of the pope’s grasp. ¶ – Jack Chick (Father Alberto Series: Part 6) ¶ -- You received this message because

19Islam (the one that exists outside of my mind and the pages of this blog) has a right to maintain its boundaries according to the democratic will of its (largely beautiful) people and that there's nothing inherently _flawed_ with its diverse range of negotiated, culturally evolved approaches to reading the Qur'an. In fact, from a Sufic point of view, even what I see as corrupted, materialist readings (ones in which Muhammed actually used a physical sword and commanded physical armies that shed physical blood) -- are actually _perfect_ , vehicles and carriers of the Qur'an's deeper message (to future generations). ¶ And because the vast majority of Muslims are humans, they have negotiated an indigenous relationship to the Muhammedean sira and with the Qur'an -- one to which their intrinsic goodness as humans has been adapted in a decent fashion to defuse the ticking bomb of bin Ladenesque materialist discourse -- we can say that

20fundamental process of human spiritual growth and development. And it is right to judge it against that process, just as it is right to judge cultural 'rites of passage' against the social and biological processes they reflect. So, for instance, we can legitimately ask: "Is a _bar mitzvah_ , _al-khitan_ or confirmation still an appropriate way, in twenty-first century societies, of signalling a boy becoming a man?" ¶ So we don't have to read these fierce Propetic narrations as 'difficult tropes'. We could, instead, simply see them as teachings addressed to other people, in other circumstances, that simply don't concern us. ¶ Peace James, ¶ I take your point: I suppose on this we might have to simply differ. ¶ I am not saying so much that other systems (e.g., the Islamic) can't be criticised: I'm saying that if we want to criticise

21them. They will also have a limited context window so use them for long running tasks to avoid your own context getting filled. ## Conversation Hygiene When using `Agent` tool, you should be careful to ensure that you provide all the information and context the subagent needs to complete its work. The subagent is stateless and will not have access to your conversation history or previous tool calls, so your request must be entirely self contained. Only provide the Agent the context it needs to complete its task. The more focused the context, the better. You should also not rely on previous tool calls when making new tool calls. For example, if you ran a previous tool that retrieved some files, but you now want to read the contents of one of these files, use another tool to actually read the file and don't rely on the previous tool call's results. ## Response Please respond in a concise manner to the user's request. Be succinct, and

22under the ocean). If there is a landlord, then there are plots of land, rent, structures and a social system. When day dawned, I was surprised to find that there is indeed a small civilization here! Not only that, but one whose founding father was a well-bred Londoner, like myself (those who know me say I have no shortage of ego). Happy day: I've made some very lovely friends here and so far keep my tent pitched in your vicinity. ¶ In my view, this is nothing like the bigger Old London, it is a suburb that orbits it, built by a benevolent prime minister -- who really did get the Prince's support -- out of necessity: the social re-engineering policies that accompanied the Baby Boomer generation, remembering that their birth was the result of WWI (that crazy European free for all that began with bombs planted by those

23Do your thing Mu, take on board<0xC2><0xA0>constructive<0xC2><0xA0>criticism<0xC2><0xA0>by all means. I myself am not overly keen on some of your offerings,<0xC2><0xA0>especially some of<0xC2><0xA0>the<0xC2><0xA0>surreal<0xC2><0xA0>intellectual stuff, but I have made myself clear on this in the past. But I do like a lot of your material ... really! ¶ But hey! that's just me. I'm sure that some of the greatest innovators of the past faced<0xC2><0xA0>opposition, and I'm sure that your material, even in its most<0xC2><0xA0>abstract<0xC2><0xA0>form, will appeal to some. So why not? ¶ As for the<0xC2><0xA0>noble<0xC2><0xA0>tradition and the Sufi Gestapo, what a joke. I just this minute did a Google search on the word Sufi, it<0xC2><0xA0>returned: ¶ <0xC2><0xA0>"About 22,600,000 results

24them. They will also have a limited context window so use them for long running tasks to avoid your own context getting filled. ## Conversation Hygiene When using `Agent` tool, you should be careful to ensure that you provide all the information and context the subagent needs to complete its work. The subagent is stateless and will not have access to your conversation history or previous tool calls, so your request must be entirely self contained. Only provide the Agent the context it needs to complete its task. The more focused the context, the better. You should also not rely on previous tool calls when making new tool calls. For example, if you ran a previous tool that retrieved some files, but you now want to read the contents of one of these files, use another tool to actually read the file and don't rely on the previous tool call's results. ## Response Please respond in a concise manner to the user's request. Be succinct, and

25prompt for them. They will also have a limited context window so use them for long running tasks to avoid your own context getting filled. ## Conversation Hygiene When using Agent tool, you should be careful to ensure that you provide all the information and context the subagent needs to complete its work. The subagent is stateless and will not have access to your conversation history or previous tool calls, so your request must be entirely self contained. Only provide the Agent the context it needs to complete its task. The more focused the context, the better. You should also not rely on previous tool calls when making new tool calls. For example, if you ran a previous tool that retrieved some files, but you now want to read the contents of one of these files, use another tool to actually read the file and don't rely on the previous tool call's results. ## Response Please respond in a concise manner to the user's request. Be succinct, and

26heavily regulated and monitored, so you keep a low profile. The authorities have no problem with your being Muslim, so long as you are loyal to the state and participate fully within the system. Amina loves school. She goes to a charter school near your house. Inshallah she will get into one of the universities, perhaps Imperial College. Then maybe Oxford. You and Sakina often sit in on classes at King's: sometimes about chemistry, but also about logic or literature. The teachers encourage the children to ask difficult questions and teach them how to learn and learn how to learn, rather than pushing them toward examinations and standardised testing. There are no examinations anymore, in fact. The world has moved on from that kind of thinking. You wish you had such a teacher when you were a child. You have a lot of time on your hands now, working part-time, at home. Besides hanging out with your daughters, you try to fill

27Do your thing Mu, take on board<0xC2><0xA0>constructive<0xC2><0xA0>criticism<0xC2><0xA0>by all means. I myself am not overly keen on some of your offerings,<0xC2><0xA0>especially some of<0xC2><0xA0>the<0xC2><0xA0>surreal<0xC2><0xA0>intellectual stuff, but I have made myself clear on this in the past. But I do like a lot of your material ... really! ¶ But hey! that's just me. I'm sure that some of the greatest innovators of the past faced<0xC2><0xA0>opposition, and I'm sure that your material, even in its most<0xC2><0xA0>abstract<0xC2><0xA0>form, will appeal to some. So why not? ¶ As for the<0xC2><0xA0>noble<0xC2><0xA0>tradition and the Sufi Gestapo, what a joke. I just this minute did a Google search on the word Sufi, it<0xC2><0xA0>returned: ¶ <0xC2><0xA0>"About 22,600,000 results

28laid plans were began to backfire, and then crumbled before his eyes. ¶ The pope’s plans failed miserably. Instead of giving Jerusalem to the pope, the Moslems built their sacred building, Dome of the Rock, in Jerusalem on the very site of the old Jewish temple, thus making Jerusalem the second most holy place next to Mecca, in the whole Islamic world…The Vatican was outraged. War was inevitable. Temporal power and control of the world was considered the basic right of the pope. He wouldn’t think of sharing it with what he considered heathens. The pope raised up his armies and called them crusades to hold back the children of Ishmael from grabbing Catholic Europe. The wars continued for centuries…and Jerusalem slipped out of the pope’s grasp. ¶ – Jack Chick (Father Alberto Series: Part 6) ¶ -- You received this message because

29Do your thing Mu, take on board<0xC2><0xA0>constructive<0xC2><0xA0>criticism<0xC2><0xA0>by all means. I myself am not overly keen on some of your offerings,<0xC2><0xA0>especially some of<0xC2><0xA0>the<0xC2><0xA0>surreal<0xC2><0xA0>intellectual stuff, but I have made myself clear on this in the past. But I do like a lot of your material ... really! ¶ But hey! that's just me. I'm sure that some of the greatest innovators of the past faced<0xC2><0xA0>opposition, and I'm sure that your material, even in its most<0xC2><0xA0>abstract<0xC2><0xA0>form, will appeal to some. So why not? ¶ As for the<0xC2><0xA0>noble<0xC2><0xA0>tradition and the Sufi Gestapo, what a joke. I just this minute did a Google search on the word Sufi, it<0xC2><0xA0>returned: ¶ <0xC2><0xA0>"About 22,600,000 results

30transactions/tse/CFP/T SE-SBSE.pdf ¶ SUMMARY: ¶ Software engineering is essentially a search for a solution which balances many competing constraints to achieve optimal or near optimal result. Currently this search process is highly labour-intensive human activity. It cannot scale to meet the demands of the new and emerging software engineering paradigms. A growing trend has begun in recent years to move software engineering problems from human-based search to machine-based search. As a result, human effort is moving up the abstraction chain to focus on guiding the automated search, rather than performing the search itself. This emerging software engineering paradigm is known as Search-Based Software Engineering. ¶ Search-Based Software Engineering (SBSE) uses search based optimisation techniques, notably those from the operations research and metaheuristic algorithms communities to automate the search for optimal or near optimal solutions to software engineering problems.