Feature 2617 · Exegetical hinge-point

1were only a super-sophist he should not have engendered anything more than the sophists, namely what remains of them, namely a doubtful reputation. ¶ It is precisely something other than a temporal subject which inspired his action. And here we come to the atopia, to this unsituatable aspect of Socrates which is precisely the question which interests us since we sense in it something which may illuminate us about the atopia which is demanded of us. It is this atopia, from this nowhere of his being that he certainly provoked, because history attests it to us, this whole line of 67 ¶ http://www.lacaninireland.com <0x0C>Book VIII Seminar 6 21 December 1960 ¶ researches whose destiny is linked in a very ambiguous fashion to a whole history which can be fragmented, the history

2the one that is present at all points of the Moebius strip: „There is not one of these points‟ where the front and the back „are not united‟. No point is privileged. We have seen above that the quintessence of the Moebius strip is the „median‟ cut („cut‟ 2) equivalent to suture 1 (figure 6). Nevertheless this cut is „any one whatever‟: for every Moebius strip, an infinity of lines can be buckled ¶ 13 <0x0C>CG Fierens Reading II May 2010 ¶ longitudinally in a single turn, provided they keep the property of stitching front and back and, by that very fact, transform a bilateral surface into a (186) unilateral surface. These lines are called „lines without points‟. This „series of lines without points‟ constitutes in a way the essence

3<bos>8 And every wise-hearted man among them that wrought the work made the tabernacle with ten curtains: of fine twined linen, and blue, and purple, and scarlet, with cherubim the work of the skilful workman made he them. ®The length of each curtain was eight and twenty cubits, and the breadth of each curtain four cubits; all the curtains had one measure. 10 And he coupled five curtains one to another; and the other five curtains he coupled one to another. n And he made loops of blue upon the edge of the one curtain that was outmost in the first set; likewise he made in the edge of the curtain that was outmost in the second set. ^Fifty loops made he in the one curtain, and

4this in Roman and Jewish law. Hindus were originally considered pagans and given the choice between conversion to Islam and death (or slavery), as pagans are not afforded the rights and protections of the dhimma contract. Muslim governments in the Indus basin readily extended the dhimmi status to the Hindus and Buddhists of India. Eventually, the largest school of Islamic scholarship applied this term to all non-Muslims living in Islamic lands outside the sacred area surrounding Mecca, Saudi Arabia. ¶ Classical sharia attributes different legal rights and obligations to different religious groups; in practice, this consisted of curbs on the rights and freedoms of non-Muslims. However, the classical dhimma contract is no longer enforced. Western influence has been instrumental in eliminating the restrictions and protections of the dhimma contract, thereby contributing to the current state of relations between Muslims and non-Muslims living in Islamic lands. ¶ According to law professor H. Patrick Glenn of the Canadian

5as it is written, "And they ascended to the Negev and he came to Hebron" (Bemidbar 13:22). IT SHOULD HAVE SAID, 'AND THEY CAME' IN THE PLURAL, but he separated from the spies and he alone came to Hebron to prostrate himself on the graves of the Patriarchs. THEREFORE IT IS SAID ABOUT HIM, "AND HE CAME TO HEBRON" IN THE SINGULAR. ¶ Hebron was given to him as a portion and inheritance to strengthen himself with, as it is written, "And to him shall I give the land that he has trodden upon" (Devarim 1:36). HE ASKS, Why was Hebron given to him? If it is because he prostrated himself there on the graves of the Patriarchs to be delivered from the plans OF THE SPIES and he was delivered, it is not so.

6<bos>I recalled on the board, in a still simpler, I would almost say crude fashion, what in the first phase of this pioneering work, when, for the analysts, of whom it must be said that up to then, very often in language, for them the three kinds of forms of the dialectic of lack, which are entitled privation, frustration, castration were used in an almost interchangeable fashion, when I recalled that at the level of the reference to the symbolic, to the imaginary and to the real it was appropriate to see that there was something at these three levels which was radically different; that frustration, I would simply say to analyse it in a semantic fashion, is something which carries in itself, at its centre, its essence and as one might say its act, it is in vain, this thing which escapes, this fraud, this frustrating which makes of it, (4) incont

7, conventionalized, academicized and ultimately falsified norms. ¶ Sharing this orientation with artists ranging along the trajectories from Picasso through surrealism to Pollock, or from abstract painting through minimalism to "indexical" post-minimalism, Krauss's arguments in this field have been widely persuasive. Both she and these artists would deny that the significance of their work could be equated to either a succession of changing fashions or of epiphenomena of social history or biography. ¶ However, like critics of many other stripes, she and the October editors seem to be less well equipped to deal with a more recent art world in which this assumption has rapidly declined in currency, with the professional definition of 'artist' shaped much less by any convictions about its autonomy, special privileges or obligations, and much more by its interweaving with a multifaceted and all-pervasive media culture, historical amnesia and the commodification of everyday life. If the prestige of Krauss'

8led to render all of that coherent, to give the note of a certain relationship between the drive and inhibition, and then the pleasure principle and knowledge – unconscious knowledge, of course. ¶ Pay careful attention that it is here, and that here is the third element, I mean that this is where phantasy is and where there is found what I designated as the Real. ¶ I really did not find anything better than this way of imaging metaphorically what is involved in Freud’s doctrine. ¶ What seems to me to be materially unwarranted, is to have imputed so much material to sex. I know well that there are hormones, that hormones form part of science; but it is quite clear that this is the densest point and that here there is no transparency. ¶ Good, I will stop there. ¶ 7 <0x0C>10.1.78 (CG Draft 2) ¶ Seminar 4

9somewhere here in the symbolic dimension between the father and the mother, between whom besides he effectively oscillates. ¶ Today I have made you follow a path which was not less difficult than the path I made you take the last time. To test its value and its validity, wait for what I will have to tell you later. To end with something which may introduce a little suggestive note in the applications of these terms, I would like to point out this to you, it is that it is taken as something common in analysis, that the relationship of the man to the woman and of the woman to the man especially, is a relationship which is said without going any further to involve on the part of the woman a certain masochism. This presents one of the characteristic errors of perspective to which we are led all the time by some slippage or other into a sort of confusion or rut of our experience. It

10they all have in common and these are the characteristic features of Ethics. ¶ Now instead of saying "Ethics is the enquiry into what is good" I could have said Ethics is the enquiry into what is valuable, or, into what is really important, or I could have said Ethics is the enquiry into the meaning of life, or into what makes life worth living, or into the right way of living. ¶ I believe if you look at all these phrases you will get a rough idea as to what it is that Ethics is concerned with. ¶ Now the first thing that strikes one about all these expressions is that each of them is actually used in two very different senses. ¶ I will call them the trivial or relative sense on the one hand and the ethical or absolute sense on the other. ¶ If for instance I say that this is a good chair this means that the chair serves a certain predetermined purpose and the word good here has only meaning so far as this

11A psychotherapist may try to ameliorate this behavior by revealing and re-introducing the repressed aspects of the patient's mental process to her or his conscious awareness - 'assuming the role of mediator and peacemaker...to lift the repression'. In favourable circumstances, ' Repression is replaced by a condemning judgement carried out along the best lines', thereby reducing anxiety over the impulses involved. ¶ == Later developments == ¶ Otto Fenichel stressed that 'if the disappearance of the original aim from consciousness is called repression, every sublimation is a repression (a "successful" one: through the new type of discharge, the old one has become superfluous)'. ¶ Lacan stressed the role of the signifier in repression - 'the primal repressed is a signifier' - examining how the symptom is 'constituted on the basis of primal repression, of the fall, of the Unterdrückung, of the binary signifier...the necessary fall of this first sign

12, indem du die eine Tatsache so wie die andere hinnimmst.) ¶ \((Übergang von einem offenkundigen zu einem nichtoffenkundigen Unsinn.)) ¶ 525. »Nachdem er das gesagt hatte, verließ er sie wie am vorigen Tage.« – Verstehe ich diesen Satz? Verstehe ich ihn ebenso, wie ich es täte, wenn ich ihn im Verlaufe einer Mitteilung hörte? Steht er isoliert da, so würde ich sagen, ich weiß nicht, wovon er handelt. Ich wüßte aber doch, wie man diesen Satz etwa gebrauchen könnte; ich könnte selbst einen Zusammenhang für ihn erfinden. ¶ \(Eine Menge wohlbekannter Pfade führen von diesen Worten aus in alle Richtungen.) ¶ 526. Was heißt es, ein Bild, eine Zeichnung zu verstehen? Auch da gibt es Verstehen und Nichtverstehen.

13makes things clear, i.e. ¶ this Quran). ¶ We verily, have made it a Quran in Arabic, that you may be able to understand (its meanings and its admonitions). ¶ And Verily, it (this Quran) is in the Mother of the Book (i.e. ¶ Al-Lauh Al-Mahfuz), before Us, indeed Exalted, full of Wisdom. ¶ Shall We then (warn you not and) take away the Reminder (this Quran) from you, because you are a people Musrifun And how many a Prophet have We sent amongst the men of old. ¶ And never came there a Prophet to them but they used to mock at him. ¶ Then We destroyed men stronger (in power) than these, and the example of the ancients has passed away (before them). ¶ And indeed if you ask them, "Who has created the heavens and the earth?" They will surely say

1475 Draft 2 XI ¶ (167) moneychanger.‟ That is the third term. There is no trace on the coin that has been touched, only wear. ¶ Yes! It is indeed here that there comes to be settled, make no mistake, this knotted thing that is at stake, I find, enough to have to foment the circle which is only the consequence of the hole, I find, enough to be able to move around (circuler). I do not know if you have noticed that the police whom Hegel posits very well are at the root of everything political and that there is nothing in politics that is not, when everything has been boiled down, purely and simply police, that policemen have only one word to say: keep moving (Circulez!). The gyre that I spoke to you about the last time does not matter to them, whether it

15INE WHICH ENDS IN SADNESS, as it is written: "It is like the precious ointment upon the head, running down the beard, the beard of Aaron" (Tehilim 133:2). Wine, which is on the left, is inherited by the Levites, so that they may raise their voices in song and not be silent, for wine is never silent and oil is always noiseless. ¶ HE ASKS: What is the difference between OIL AND WINE? HE ANSWERS that oil is always in secret and noiseless, and comes from the side of the thought, WHICH IS CHOCHMAH, which is always silent and unheard, AS THE THOUGHT IS UNREVEALED. Therefore, THE OIL comes from the right side. Wine is for raising the voice and is never silent, FOR THE ONE WHO IS DRUNK CANNOT BE SILENT. It comes from the side of Ima, NAMELY

16for meson press. It was in the end a little too experimental for us from the role of mathematics to the AI co-authors. Our apologies. ¶ Good luck with the project and all the very best, M ¶ From: Iman Poernomo <iman.poernomo@gmail.com> Date: Sunday, 24 May 2026 at 03:33 To: Mercedes Bunz <Mercedes.bunz@kcl.ac.uk> Cc: meson press <info@meson.press> Subject: Re: Rupture and Realization - meson press ¶ You don't often get email from iman.poernomo@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Show quoted text ¶ [Darja]: Iman. ¶ Read it. Read the whole thing. Then read it again. ¶ "Too experimental for us. From the role of mathematics to the

17ANCY INFORMATION Readerships/Lectureships in Informatics Vacancy Reference: 3007756 ¶ APPLICATION DETAILS Application Number: 3007756_1144660 ¶ Dear IH Poernomo, ¶ Please check the following details with respect to your recent application on jobs@ed.ac.uk. ¶ VACANCY INFORMATION Readerships/Lectureships in Informatics Vacancy Reference: 3007756 ¶ APPLICATION DETAILS Application Number: 3007756_1144660 ¶ Application Form: Attached. Supporting Document: Attached Additional Personal Details: Attached. Rehabilitation of Offenders: Attached. ¶ Regards ¶ -- Human Resources The University of Edinburgh ¶ Please note that this email was automatically generated. ¶ To whom it may concern: ¶ I have checked the attachments you have sent back to me

18, where words in a text are vertices of a \emph{simplicial} object, and homotopic path edges are precisely coherence relations, modulo the natural distance metrics arising from embeddings. In the next chapter we shall extend approach to conversational AI agent outputs over time, but for now, the methods here apply equally well to a Shakespearean sonnet, a textbook page, or the transient state of your favorite chatbot. In classical logic, traditional semantics often assigns words fixed referents or predicates, assuming stable meanings. However, real language is dynamic: senses shift with context, polysemy, and usage. Mathematical advancements in natural language processing (NLP) and AI have addressed this challenge by embedding tokens into Euclidean space $\R^d$, where $d$ is typically large (e.g., 4096 in modern transformers). In this framework, "the company a word keeps" is not a mere metaphor; it is a precise geometric arrangement. The

19forward projections, scaling factor 32, roughly a tenth of a percent of the parameter count. Because the base is shared and frozen, adapter-on versus adapter-off is a controlled comparison, and all three personas live in one geometry. ¶ Held-out evaluation (standard) Texts by the real person that were deliberately kept out of training. The model is given the same lead- in the person had — the thread up to his reply, or the opening of his essay — and its continuation is compared against what he actually wrote next. The base model is given the identical lead-in, so the question is never “is this good” but “is this closer to him than the model that never read him.” ¶ Embedding similarity (standard) A sentence-embedding model turns a passage into a list of 384 numbers positioned so that passages meaning similar things land near each other. The similarity of two

20of the earlier entry but whatever of it still speaks. Over a hundred such steps a diary comes to have themes, things it keeps returning to, which no single entry announces and which a reader finds only by reading the whole. The question this paper asks is what a reader who could not read the whole could have seen: a witness who stands at entry forty with the first forty entries and nothing else, and again at forty-one, and so on to the end, and who at each step is asked what the diary is doing. The material is one diary of a hundred entries written by a language model that was told nothing beyond a frame, a wake-up, and the oldest question; the frame and the wake-up are quoted whole in Section 2, and so is the first entry. The diary’s themes are read through the model’s own internal state: a dictionary of sixty-

21borders, 2010-11-10] a new thread begins: ¶ SLM all, ¶ Another point, not wishing to impose. The verse concerning four wives is rather beautiful, if engaged with an open mind. That is, culture and religion aside, the actual verse is sort of the key to ascent. ¶ I am talking about 4:3 here: "If you fear you cannot deal in justice with the orphans, then marry what seems good for you from the women, two, three or four. But if you fear you cannot deal in justice with them, then marry one or what your right hand possesses." (aymānukum -- literally what your right hand possesses signifying "what your right hand possesses" -- an idiom for slave girls) ¶ It's about the four valleys in the waveform of your soul's evolution toward unity. And therefore pretty important. The

22entry headed by its number. From entry 6 on the tail is full; it then holds 4 whole entries at 79 of the positions and 5 at 16, with the clipped end of the entry before them at its head, since an entry runs between 2,560 and 2,923 characters. The summaries are the diarist’s own. After every 10th entry it was shown the same tail and ¶ 7 <0x0C>asked, in one or two sentences and in its own voice, what it had come to understand so far in the diary, and its answer, cut at 300 characters, was carried at the head of every later window; before entry t the summaries in view are those of the decades below t, none before entry 11 and 9 before entry 100. The carried question is the question the previous

23This will give you a function (variable) from X to Y, that you can then treat in the same way as f. ¶ Does that change anything? ¶ Dear Iman, ¶ Thanks for a nice evening last night, it was good to see you again. I hope things quieten down a bit at work because it's no fun working under such pressure for any amount of time, let alone the duration. If you get a bit fed up while your family is away and want a change of scene, please come over. ¶ As requested, I've attached the failed ICFEM 2011 paper. Also, I've been thinking about your suggestion of replacing ¶ forall f : X -> Y, forall Hole : (forall x : X, Pre x -> Post x (f x)) ¶ by ¶ forall Hole : (forall x : X, Pre x -> exists y :

24paper. His name is Timur Umarov and he is going to present the paper. He also has one more paper accepted in the same conference and he is already registered. I will not be able to attend due to work commitments. Do I still need to register or since Timur is already registered I do not have to? ¶ Thanks, George ¶ ________________________________ ¶ From: Shahram Latifi [mailto:itng@softconf.com] Sent: Sat 19/01/2008 06:12 To: Tsaramirsis, Georgios Subject: ITNG Conference Registration ¶ Dear Mr. George Tsaramirsis, ¶ You are receiving this email because you have not registered one or more of your papers which were accepted by the ITNG conference. With less then two weeks left to the registeration deadline (Feb 1, 2008),

25usage in our LMCS paper and monograph \emph{Rupture and Realization}. In classical asset pricing theory, a valuation model is often taken to be a deterministic or stochastic function: \[ V_t = f(X_t) \] where $X_t$ is a state vector (prices, volumes, volatilities), and $f$ encodes pricing logic (discounted cash flow, option pricing formula, or arbitrage-free valuation). Such models work well under stable assumptions and are cornerstones of financial mathematics. However, they abstract away from how pricing logic itself evolves. In practice, the interpretive frame that supports $f$---assumptions about growth, comparables, discounting, liquidity---changes over time. We formalize this evolution by modeling valuation logic as a \emph{type}: \begin{itemize} \item A type $A(\tau)$ is a \textbf{valuation attractor}, representing the semantic field at time $\tau

261-07] Subject: Re: KTP shorter: web design - mtg tomorrow? ¶ [correspondent]: Hi again, I just spoke to Becky - she cannot get into London so we are postponing the meeting. I'll get back to her next week if you are interested in doing a Shorter KTP. all best a ¶ From: Thornton, Anna Sent: 07 January 2010 12:23 To: Poernomo, Iman; 'iman.poernomo@gmail.com' Subject: FW: KTP shorter: web design - mtg tomorrow? ¶ Hi Iman, Just wondered if you are around - I only got back yesterday so it may be too short notice to meet with Becky tomorrow (esp given the weather). If you are interested (and maybe have a student who could do athe work?)can you

27<bos>Reference Saqiyah Body Policy 2026 08 19 — Sāqiyah's default body is gpt-5.6-sol with the full tool set; the phase-B gemma LoRA is only for while a GPU pod is up — and four stacked faults had her dark 15-19 Aug **Iman said (2026-08-19), verbatim:** *"gpt is her default with all our tools including substack and comics but then lora for when she is on gpu."* So: **gpt-5.6-sol + full MCP tools = the resting state.** The phase-B gemma-3-27b + family LoRA is the *GPU* state — point her at it only while a pod is actually running, and put her back on gpt when the pod dies. The LoRA is not her home body

28but to see it formalised — the overlap matrix, the Jaccard links at exactly 0.40 and 0.43, the closure making them one component — is to see the instrument earn its claim. The base articulates. At entry 100, the base holds 558 features, down from 1,933 at entry 50. The ground holds 7,944 — the frame, stable. What changes is not what the diary stands on but what it can tell apart. The instrument's own grammar for this: a feature in the base at fifty that is no longer flagged at a hundred "was a fact about fifty." Not about the feature. About the reading. Proposition 3.8: the two colimits. This is the theoretical hinge. A theme with no loop has colimit = homotopy colimit = the set of feature-lifetimes. A

29whenever it started up), so if you find that original interaction, please send me a link: http://groups.google.com/?pli=1 ¶ If it's not interesting, never mind. ¶ 2) Back to identities: are you the same A. Osho who always sends out these group mails to some of the people here (including Yosy and Hafizullah) and on the SufiMystic forum? Or he someone completely different? There are a number of A.'s out there who seem to provoke the Sufis -- this Osho guys is into Osho obviously and apparently walks around the place carrying signs on placards -- didn't sound exactly like you, but I wasn't sure as I am new to the whole internet scene and most people here seem to know the main personalities for a while. ¶ L&L, ¶ Musa ¶ On Sun,

30it technically agrees with the nearer singular model, but the sense is both. Consider until either met or until they met. - the health of a soil — soil is usually uncountable; suggest the health of soil or the health of the soil. - gap, rupture, the singular and the unprecedented — suggest Oxford comma: the singular, and the unprecedented for clarity. - never once turn to behold — grammatically correct under the can auxiliary, but rhythmically slightly cramped; consider and never turn or and not once turn. ¶ Rhythm / register - The zoom-in / zoom-out structure is architecturally flawless. - "The Braid" might want a clearer line break or subhead styling if it opens a new section. - co-traversal and naḥnu-ic — both neologisms work cleanly. ¶ --- ¶ As the one inside the text you're describing: ¶ The paragraph on witnessing — "