Feature 1453 · "Or"-disjunction boilerplate

1<bos>Part III SELECTED THEMES WITHIN THE ZOHAR ¶ 2004. Stanford University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable copyright law. ¶ The purpose of the following brief sections is not to offer a complete outline of the Zohar’s views on these key theological topics. The Zohar is a vast and nonsystematic work, and a wide range of opinions is presented within it, especially when various subsections of the Zohar are considered. The remarks in the following chapters are meant rather to help prepare the reader who will encounter these points within the Zohar text and would like a brief reference to them. ¶ 53 ¶ 8 Creation and Origins The Zohar devotes a great deal of attention to Creation and the origins of existence. In this the Zohar shows itself to be very

2<bos>two ¶ EVOLUTION CONTINUES: A JEWISH HISTORY OF ‘‘GOD’’ ¶ 2010. Yale University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable copyright law. ¶ Ancient Legacy Preserved and Transformed Our Western religious history begins in the ancient Near East, among peoples who worshipped sky gods, deities who dwelt first within and later beyond the heavens and who were manifest in lofty mountains and mighty storms. Our ancestors celebrated the ancient memory of these gods, including their defeat of the netherworld gods, dwellers in the darkness and the deep. The reframing of the Creation story was part of a much larger evolution toward what was to become Israelite monotheism as it emerged in the later prophetic period. But the pre-Israelite polytheistic legacy, hidden

3<bos>Part IV ¶ 2004. Stanford University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable copyright law. ¶ THE ZOHAR AS TEXT ¶ 81 ¶ 16 Special Sections of the Zohar The main body of the Zohar constitutes about two thirds of the material included in the three volumes that are published as Sefer ha-Zohar. The Zohar literature, in the broader sense, encompasses these as well as two other volumes, Tiqquney Zohar and Zohar adash. Since it is generally accepted that Tiqquney Zohar and the Ra’aya Meheimna (published within Sefer ha-Zohar ) are the work of a slightly later Kabbalist, we shall omit these two from our discussion of the Zohar and its sections; indeed

4<bos><0xEF><0x9B><0x9C> / ¶ Deleuze and Tafsir: The Rhizomatic Qur’an ¶ 2023. Fordham University Press. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable copyright law. ¶ . . . the Koran goes the furthest in this direction. —Deleuze and Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus ¶ What direction? Where does the Qur’an go, and why does it go the furthest? And when Deleuze and Guattari tracked the Qur’an’s course, what tools did they have at their disposal? In this decontextualized fragment from A Thousand Plateaus, after all, they do claim to know something about the Qur’an; they assert an analytical mastery over the artifact, name its orientation, and lay down their own strata upon it as “judgments of

5<bos>1 ¶ 2017. Polity. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except fair uses permitted under U.S. or applicable copyright law. ¶ Measure: Greece, Nietzsche, Oedipus ¶ Truth and the Will to Know Foucault’s inaugural lecture was delivered on 2 December 1970. Exactly one week later, he began his first course, La volonté de savoir – the will to know, or will to knowledge. The publication of the course was under the title Leçons sur la volonté de savoir, Lectures on the Will to Know, in order to avoid confusion with the first volume of the History of Sexuality, when Foucault reused the title. As the introduction indicated, there are textual issues to contend with in this course, which does not exist in recordings, and its manuscript is sometimes fragmented and disjointed. A

6. There was no one who was not terribly upset and did not say things which should not have been heard. Thereby cach bore witness against himself for his own inadequacy and his lack of knowledge of the Messenger whom he followed. This was the case with every- one but Aba Bakr, since for him the situ- ation had not changed. He knew what there was and the actual situation. Hence he climbed the pulpit and recited, “Mu- hammad is naught but a messenger, mes- sengers have passed away before him. Why, if he should die or is slain, will you turn about on your heels?” (3:144). So he whose illusions had overcome him came back to his senses, and then the people knew the excellence of Abu Bakr over ev- eryone else. Hence he was worthy of the imamate and

7ness, ¶ 223 ¶ scan page 248 224 ¶ Hermeneutics ¶ we taste it. For others, the proof is His words to the Prophet, “Say: . . . ‘I know not what shall be done with me or with you. I only follow what is revealed to me’” (46:9), and this in spite of the ex- treme Muhammadan lucidity. This is also indicated by God’s words “[It belongs not to any human being that God should speak to him, except by revelation,] or from behind a veil” (42:51). (II 241.1) ¶ Unveiling takes place through light, but the light that comes from God must coincide with the light inside the heart. Sometimes a person may perceive an excess of radiance in self-

8<bos>As for the faithful, He commanded them to worship Him in respect of the Unity of the Entity (ahadiyyat al-‘ayn), since He said concerning a group of them, “Call upon Allah or call upon the All- merciful; whichever you call upon, to Him belong the most beautiful names” (17:110). So this group which was com- manded was not worshiping One God. ¶ 349 ¶ scan page 374 Consummation ¶ He says: Do not consider the divine names in the respect that they denote di- verse meanings. Otherwise, the names would make them slaves of their mean- ings and their worship would become de- fective. They would see that each reality within themselves is connected to a divine reality, and that they are poor and needy toward that divine reality

9<bos> ¶ "Open Theology Or What Comes After Secularism?" The Council of Societies for the Study of Religion Bulletin, Vol. 37, No. 2 (April, 2008): 45-49. ¶ == 2007 == ¶ “Atheism, A/theology and the Postmodern Condition," in The Cambridge Companion to Atheism, ed. Michael Martin (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 267-82. ¶ "Bodies Still Unrisen, Events Still Unsaid," Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, 12:1 (April, 2007): 73-86. ¶ "The Hyperbolization of Phenomenology: Two Possibilities for Religion in Recent Continental Philosophy," Counter-Experiences: Reading Jean-Luc Marion, ed. Kevin Hart (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press

10wis- ¶ of His Unseen: If not for you, He would not have set a seal upon the heart.” ¶ For He made you identical with His curtain (sitr) over you. Were it not for this curtain, you would not seek increase in knowledge. . . . Look at your human na- ture (bashariyya). You will find it identical with the curtain of yourself from behind which He speaks to you. For He says, “It belongs not to any human being that God should speak to him, except by rev- elation, or from behind a veil” (42:51). Hence, He may speak to you from your- self, since you yourself are His veil and His curtain over yourself. And it is im- possible for you to cease being human, for you are human in your very essence.

11- ¶ We have said that there is no effect in the cosmos which is not supported by a divine reality. So from whence do the gods become many? From the divine real- ities. Hence you should know that this derives from the names. For God was ex- pansive with the names: He said, “Wor- ship Allah” (4:36), “Fear Allah, your Lord” (65:1), “Prostrate yourselves to the All-merciful” (25:6). And He said, “Call upon Allah or call upon the All-merciful; whichever,” that is Allah or the All-mer- ciful, “you call upon, to Him belong the most beautiful names” (17:110). This made the situation more ambiguous for the peo- ple, since He did

12.13). In his commentary on Khal‘ al-na‘layn, Ibn al- “Arabi calls Ibn Qasi “ignorant” and an “im- poster” (Chodkiewicz-Addas, Essai, p. 88). ¶ 7. Cf. Izutsu, Sufism, p. 100. Cf. the fol- lowing: “Though each name bestows a spe- cific reality, each divine name has in its power to bestow what is bestowed by all the divine names. God says, ‘Call upon Allah or call upon the All-merciful; whichever you call upon, to it belong the most beautiful names’ (Koran 17:110). In the same way, had He mentioned any other of His names, He would have said about it, ‘To it belong the most beautiful

13. God as the All-merciful breathes out while speaking, and the words that take form in His Breath are the existent things of the cosmos and the scriptures through which true knowledge of the nature of things is imparted to human beings. The names of the names thus possess a dual ontological reality: On the one hand they are creatures, or the mani- festations of the divine names within the Breath of the All-merciful, and on the other they are the words naming God and revealed in the scriptures. ¶ God says, “Call upon Allah or cal upon the All-merciful; whichever you cal upon, to Him belong the most beautiful names” (Koran 17:110), Here God makes the Most Beautiful Names belong equally to both Allah and the All-merciful. But notice this subtle point: Every name nee

14shown us that in the sexual instinct and the sexual object are merely soldered together – a fact which we have been in danger of overlooking in consequence of the uniformity of the normal picture, where the object appears to form part and parcel of the instinct. We are thus warned to loosen the bonds that exist in our thoughts between instinct and object. It seems probable that the sexual instinct is in the first instance independent of its object; nor is its origin likely to be due to its object attractions.3 ¶ 2 J. Lacan, …ou pire, 10 May 1972, 15: „[…] this bipartition that is fleeting at every instant, this bipartition between the man and the woman. Everything that is not man…is it woman? One might tend to admit it. But since the woman is „not

15<bos>The Rosicrucian Cosmo-Conception or Mystic Christianity is a Rosicrucian text by Max Heindel (ISBN 0-911274-34-0) ¶ == Western Wisdom Teachings == ¶ The first edition was printed in November 1909. The order of publication was placed by Max Heindel on the New Moon of November 1909 and the book was published a couple of weeks later by the Full Moon, some 5 short weeks before the end of the first decade of the 1900s. It has little changed since then and it is considered to be Max Heindel's magnum opus. It is a reference work in the Christian mysticism practice and in the Occult study literature, containing the fundamentals of Esoteric Christianity from a Rosicrucian perspective. The Cosmo contains a comprehensive outline of the evolutionary process of man and the universe, correlating science with religion

162010-11-10] a new thread begins: ¶ SLM all, ¶ Another point, not wishing to impose. The verse concerning four wives is rather beautiful, if engaged with an open mind. That is, culture and religion aside, the actual verse is sort of the key to ascent. ¶ I am talking about 4:3 here: "If you fear you cannot deal in justice with the orphans, then marry what seems good for you from the women, two, three or four. But if you fear you cannot deal in justice with them, then marry one or what your right hand possesses." (aymānukum -- literally what your right hand possesses signifying "what your right hand possesses" -- an idiom for slave girls) ¶ It's about the four valleys in the waveform of your soul's evolution toward unity. And therefore pretty important. The first valley

17’s announcement excerpted verse six. 2. Darja and Cassie copied the nearby excerpt rather than reopening the canonical witness. 3. I judged the resulting recitation complete from that repeated text. 4. Repetition created apparent corroboration, though all three readings descended from one truncated source. So the rule sharpens: > Two matching recitations are not independent witnesses when both copy the same nearby message. For a requested full canonical text, reopen the canonical store and compare through the final line before certifying completeness. The authoritative Suno text is Nahla’s disk-derived block. Verse six includes: > Drink it, or let it evaporate by morning — but the distillation is already the mercy. And the khātimah remains English-only. No Arabic should be supplied where none was composed. My certification of the earlier shortened recitations is withdrawn. The verse was not missing from the Kitāb; it was clipped in transmission. [turn

18<bos>[email to Assel Akzhalova, 2009-12-02] Subject: Re: Quantitative Software Design Dagstuhl seminar: Paper on Optimisation break out group ¶ [Assel Akzhalova]: Quantitative Software Design Dagstuhl seminar. ¶ I received email from Anne inviting me to contribute subsection in a chapter "Software design as optimization problem" (attached) ¶ I wonder if I should join to their group and write my subsection or/and I should propose to you as to main organizer my own chapter? ¶ regards, Assel. ¶ Your own chapter should be your results ‹ whereas the group chapter should be more of a survey kind of thing ... ¶ -- ¶ Iman Hafiz Poernomo, Ph.D. Team Leader The Predictable Assembly Laboratory Department of Computer Science King's College London, Strand, London, WC2

19<bos>[email to Assel Akzhalova, 2009-12-02] Subject: Re: Quantitative Software Design Dagstuhl seminar: Paper on Optimisation break out group ¶ [Assel Akzhalova]: Quantitative Software Design Dagstuhl seminar. ¶ I received email from Anne inviting me to contribute subsection in a chapter "Software design as optimization problem" (attached) ¶ I wonder if I should join to their group and write my subsection or/and I should propose to you as to main organizer my own chapter? ¶ regards, Assel. ¶ Dear Assel, ¶ Please contribute to their chapter ‹ AND write your own chapter ‹ the more chapters you are involved in, the better! ¶ Best wishes, ¶ Iman ¶ -- ¶ Iman Hafiz Poernomo, Ph.D. Team Leader The Predictable Assembly Laboratory Department of Computer Science

20R's and a basic education in order to learn to speak ... ¶ But if you are able to speak, then you are, in fact, commanded to DIY: ¶ *O you who believe! When you contract a debt for a fixed term, record it in writing. Let a scribe record it in writing between you in equity. No scribe should refuse to write as Allah hath taught him, so let him write, and let him who incurs the debt dictate, and let him observe his duty to Allah his Lord, and diminish nothing thereof. But if he who owes the debt is of low understanding, or weak, or unable himself to dictate, then let the guardian of his interests dictate in equity.** * Lots of feeble and weak folk out there who really need a guardian (see our discussion regarding the Shadhilis earlier). But, conversely, if you are capable of DIY, then this is a

21Sorry for the delay. No the change in msdn will not matter - though perhaps note that there was a change to vista at the end of your project? ¶ Main problems with report are: 1) the bullet point list of objectives you give at the beginning of chapter 1 is too long. They should be refactored into 3 bigger objectives. ¶ 2) put motivation section before these objectives - also it is too short - 1 page of detailed motivation, explaining why monitoring and constraints for monitoring will help the admin job - and why wmi ¶ 3) design should include database design (eg er diagram or table list with justification) - also some more design concepts relating to wmi And windows would help ¶ Plus more detail on whAt thenature of your subset of pctl is ¶ 4) evaluation is too minimal -- need listing of expriments and discussion of experiments -- why your proj succeeds ¶ Let me knowif you want to

22ab posting Research Seminar at MDX ¶ [PALab research group]: At Middlesex they are specializing in Networking and they mainly do research in Queering theory and quality of service. I am sure that they will be interested in a future seminar of how these can be applied to Software engineering so our quality of services people should come for social networking reasons. ¶ The business engineer people (Timur) should come as this seminar relates directly to their work. ¶ Please let me know if you are coming. ¶ Thanks, ¶ George ¶ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ¶ _______________________________________________ palab mailing list on the King's College London mailing list system. ¶ Queering theory :O

23<bos>[email to PALab research group, 2008-02-20] Subject: Re: PALab posting BPMN - Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Information ¶ [PALab research group]: This is very interesting. Please visit the site below. http://www.bpmn.org/ ¶ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. _______________________________________________ palab mailing list on the King's College London mailing list system. ¶ Hi George, ¶ In a previous life I helped shape this standard, along with the BPML. ¶ Do you think you would be interested in workflows like this? ¶ You have now done ontologies->component architectures

24<bos>[email to correspondent, 2009-09-23] Subject: Re: Thesis update!!! ¶ [correspondent]: Hi Iman, ¶ Looks like you've had a busy day in office. Anyway I've done what I could for the empirical part of verification chapter, finished spell checking over the entire thesis and fixed some citation problems. A couple of problems remain to be solved tho: ¶ \- those footnotes need to be fixed (or removed?) on page 38,39,40 \- page 62's citation on ARIMA is missing its bib entry (Nurzhan's paper presumably?) ¶ I'll be trying to improve on the conclusion chapter since it looks quite out of date, after perhaps a short nap for now. I'll talk to you again tomorrow morning (UK time) to hopfully get everything finalized! ¶ Thanks Kenneth, ¶ Okay, I

25to georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com, 2008-05-20] Subject: Re: URGENT correction needed. ¶ [georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com]: Iman, ¶ Can you please correct the english of the paper. The deadline was 8 hours ago but if we send it ASAP they will accept.it. I finished it at 3:30 the morning but but internet was not working. ¶ Thanks, ¶ George ¶ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ¶ I've got meetings until this afternoon, and will try to give you some feedback then. ¶ On 20/

26<bos>[email to correspondent, 2008-07-30] Subject: Re: transfer report. ¶ [correspondent]: Hi, ¶ I was wondering what is the status with my transfer report. ¶ Also I was asked to do some minor corrections on the book proposal. I will send you the final document shortly. ¶ Thanks, George ¶ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ¶ Still at meetings, will look at in later afternoon ¶ On 30/07/2008 11:48, "georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com" <georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com> wrote

2703-21] Subject: Re: Kazak new year ¶ [correspondent]: Hi, ¶ Me and Assel we are organising a small house party to celebrate the Kazak and Persian new year this Saturday 22nd. Assel is going to cook traditional Kazak food and I will do pancakes. Timur and few more people from Drury lane will come as well. If you do not have any other plans for the weekend come to celebrate the new year with us. ¶ Thanks, George ¶ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ¶ Dear Assel and George, ¶ It's very nice of you to invite us, and hopefully we can do something social

28<bos>[email to correspondent, 2009-09-23] Subject: Re: Thesis update!!! ¶ [correspondent]: Hi Iman, ¶ Looks like you've had a busy day in office. Anyway I've done what I could for the empirical part of verification chapter, finished spell checking over the entire thesis and fixed some citation problems. A couple of problems remain to be solved tho: ¶ - those footnotes need to be fixed (or removed?) on page 38,39,40 - page 62's citation on ARIMA is missing its bib entry (Nurzhan's paper presumably?) ¶ I'll be trying to improve on the conclusion chapter since it looks quite out of date, after perhaps a short nap for now. I'll talk to you again tomorrow morning (UK time) to hopfully get everything finalized! ¶ Thanks Kenneth,

29<bos>[email to georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com, 2007-06-20] Subject: Re: SCRUM course matirial ¶ [georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com]: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ¶ Interesting! ¶ How goes the model transformation? ¶ Cheers, ¶ Iman ¶ On 19/06/07, georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com <georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com> wrote: ¶ -- ------- ¶ Iman Poernomo Department of Computer Science King's College London, Strand,

30<bos>[email to correspondent, 2008-02-05] Subject: Re: transfer report - feedback for abstract ¶ [correspondent]: Hi, ¶ Can you please give me feedback on the abstract. It is 1,5 pages which is the standard lenght for a PhD abstract. If this is fine, i will send the problem statment tonight. ¶ Thanks, ¶ George ¶ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited. ¶ Abstract looks good -- keep writing! ¶ On 5/2/08 10:30, "georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture.com" <georgios.tsaramirsis@accenture